Your judgment is the product. We carry the legwork.
The opinion is the short part. Assembling the picture behind it, occupancy, construction type, sprinklering, three referenced standards, is where the hours go, and it goes again on the next similar file.
The shape of an engagement
Six kinds of work before the one you bill for
The opinion is what the client is paying for. Everything stacked underneath it is assembly: necessary, unbillable as expertise, and waiting for you again on the next similar file.
The list is the work itself, not a measured time split: we have not measured how a consultant's hours divide, and we are not going to claim a number we do not have. What we will say is which of these BlinKode carries.
Outcomes
What you get
Here now, each with its source.
The fit
What BlinKode brings to an opinion
CodeEase keeps the analysis assembled, here now. Codiag, coming soon, will review a whole package.
An expert Code Assistant that knows the code in depth answers any building code question from the code itself, with the citation one click away. When a question turns on a classification you have not stated, it asks rather than assuming. Where the code does not answer, it says so.
Build the scenario on a project board: pull the articles, connect them, annotate them, keep the project's own documents and drawings beside them. A skilled Project Assistant with a full grasp of your project works inside it, so the reasoning stays assembled instead of being reconstructed.
Codiag will review a whole submission against the code and name each requirement not met, with its source: an output a client can act on and a reviewer can check.
Put it against a hard scenario
Bring the kind of question that normally costs you half a day. That is the honest test, and the feedback we most want.
Free for 30 days, no card. We email you when it is ready.